Use of Notices of Apparent Liability and Facts Underlying Notices of Apparent Liability in Subsequent Proceedings

Özet

This document provides further interpretation of section 504(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. The Federal Communications Commission reiterated that it would continue its policy of not using the mere issuance of or failure to pay a Notice of Apparent Liability to the prejudice of a party. The Commission concluded, however, that using the underlying facts of a prior violation that shows a pattern of non-compliant behavior against a licensee in a subsequent renewal, forfeiture, transfer, or other proceeding does not cause the prejudice that Congress sought to avoid in section 504(c). This document also reverses the Commission's prior statement that no statutory violation can be deemed to be minor for purposes of making downward adjustments to forfeiture amounts.