Energie en milieu · 4-2-19941 min lezen
Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments
Lokale automatische vertaling · Oorspronkelijke brontaal
Samenvatting
EPA expressed environmental concerns regarding the proposed alternative due to potential impacts to water quality, water quantity, air quality and vegetation. EPA recommended that the final EIS provide additional information on these issues as well as cumulative impacts and wetlands mitigation. ERP No. D-FRA-B53010-00 Rating LO1, Northeast Corridor Improvement Project, Implementation, Electrification of the Rail Main Line from New Haven to Boston, Funding, COE Section 10 and 404 Permits, New Haven, CT and Boston, MA. Summary: EPA stated that the proposed project had the potential to improve region air quality and that other environmental resources within EPA's jurisdiction and expertise would not be significantly adversely affected by the proposed project. ERP No. DC-FHW-B40050-MA Rating EC2, Central Artery/I-93 Third Harbor Tunnel/I-90 Extension, Updated and Additional Information, Design Alternatives for the Charles River Crossing, Funding, US COE Section 10 and 404 Permits, US CGD Permits and EPA NPDES Permit, Suffolk County, MA. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns for Clean Air Act conformity requirements to be addressed, and the analysis of shading impacts and compen