Dun & Bradstreet Corporation Reaches Settlement Agreement with Federal Regulators

Summary

The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation has agreed to settle allegations of violating federal law by engaging in unfair or deceptive business practices, as outlined in a consent order attached to a public comment analysis.

Original source language: Federal Register — Federal Trade CommissionOpen original release →

Add your company to Business Communicator

We monitor business sources and connect attention with companies, profiles and services available in Business Communicator.

Create a free company profile Explore businesses on Business Maps →

Create a free company profile →

Explore insights

Business insights →

Global Markets News Trade Regulation News Business Technology News Fintech for Business: Payments & Banking News Supply Chain News Central Bank Policy News

Related business signals

Market regulation · 5/28/2026

CMG Media Corporation Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment

A proposed consent order aims to settle allegations of violating federal law by prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or practices, as outlined in the attached analysis.

Read summary →

Market regulation · 5/28/2026

1010 Digital Works LLC Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment

A proposed consent order aims to settle allegations of violating federal law by prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or practices, as outlined in the attached analysis.

Read summary →

Market regulation · 8/5/2026

Caremark and Zinc Health Services; Analysis of Proposed Agreement Containing Consent Order To Aid Public Comment

A proposed consent agreement aims to settle allegations of unfair competition against Caremark and Zinc Health Services, resolving violations of federal law. The agreement includes terms outlined in the attached analysis, which explains the allegations and proposed settlement.

Read summary →

Market regulation · 6/10/2026

Ascension Health Alliance; Analysis of Proposed Agreement Containing Consent Orders To Aid Public Comment

Ascension Health Alliance has reached a settlement agreement with the Federal government to resolve allegations of unfair competition, as outlined in the attached analysis of the proposed consent order.

Read summary →

Market regulation · 5/7/2026

365 Retail Markets and Cantaloupe; Analysis of Proposed Agreement Containing Consent Orders To Aid Public Comment

A proposed consent agreement aims to settle allegations of unfair competition against 365 Retail Markets and Cantaloupe, resolving violations of federal law. The agreement includes terms outlined in the attached analysis, which provides details on the allegations and proposed settlement.

Read summary →

Market regulation · 6/23/2026

Aurobindo and Lannett; Analysis of Proposed Agreement Containing Consent Orders To Aid Public Comment

Aurobindo Pharmaceuticals and Lannett Company have reached a consent agreement to settle allegations of unfair competition, as outlined in the attached analysis of proposed consent orders. The agreement aims to address Federal law violations and facilitate public comment.

Read summary →