BN Business News
أضف شركتك →
تجري حاليًا ترجمة هذا المقال. نعرض مؤقتًا النسخة الأصلية باللغة الإنجليزية.

الابتكار والملكية الفكرية · 21‏/12‏/20202 دقائق للقراءة

Rules of Practice To Allocate the Burden of Persuasion on Motions To Amend in Trial Proceedings Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board

ترجمة آلية محلية · اللغة الأصلية للمصدر

الملخص

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO or Office) revises the rules of practice in inter partes review (IPR), post-grant review (PGR), and the transitional program for covered business method patents (CBM) (collectively post-grant trial) proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) to allocate the burdens of persuasion in relation to motions to amend and the patentability of substitute claims proposed therein. In light of Federal Circuit case law, and to better ensure the predictability and certainty of post-grant trial proceedings before the Board, the Office revises the rules of practice governing motions to amend, to expressly assign to the petitioner the burden of showing the unpatentability of substitute claims proposed in a motion to amend. In addition, the Office revises the rules to expressly assign to the patent owner the burden of showing that a motion to amend complies with certain statutory and regulatory requirements for such a motion. Notwithstanding the adversarial nature of the proceedings and the burdens described above, however, the Office further revises its rules to expressly provide that the Board itself may, in the interes

اللغة الأصلية للمصدر: Federal Register — Patent and Trademark Officeافتح البيان الأصلي →

استكشف الموضوعات

تحليلات الأعمال →