Środowisko i energia · 03/09/2004

Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments

EPA expressed environmental concerns because the draft EIS: does not analyze a full range of alternatives; does not disclose enough of the CWA Section 404 process, but defers the process until later; does not disclose the effects of additional diesel emissions from locomotives on air quality; and does not disclose mitigation for the preferred alternative, particularly for wetlands, riparian woodland and air quality impacts from construction. ERP No. D-NOA-E91015-00 Rating LO, Reef Fish Fishery Management Plan (FMP) Amendment 23, To Set Vermilion Snapper Sustainable Fisheries Act Targets and Thresholds and to Establish a Plan to End Overfishing and Rebuild the Stock, Implementation, Gulf of Mexico. Summary: EPA has no objections to the proposed action. ERP No. DS-BLM-K60105-CA Rating EC2, U.S. Army National Training Center, Proposed Addition of Maneuver Training Land at Fort Irwin, Implementation, San Bernardino County, CA. Summary: EPA raised environmental concerns regarding impacts and mitigation for construction-related air emission, and properly reporting the release of oil or a hazardous substance into the environment. ERP No. DS-NOA-A91063-00 Rating LO, Monkfish Fishery Manage