Środowisko i energia · 17.09.2004

Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments

EPA has no objection to the selection of the Tentatively Selected Plan of Action, and supports the primary restoration strategies, namely, river reintroduction and barrier island/shoreline restoration. ERP No. D-COE-K39086-CA Rating EC2, Matilija Dam Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Study, Restoring Anadromous Fish Populations, Matilija Creek, Ventura River, Ventura County Watershed Protection District, Ventura County, CA. Summary: EPA supports the proposed project. However, EPA has environmental concerns regarding the potential adverse impacts of a flooding event mobilizing a large quantity of sediment, as well as impacts regarding the proposed slurry disposal sites. ERP No. D-FHW-E40801-00 Rating EC2, Interstate 69 Section of Independent Utility 9, Construction from the Interstate 55/MS State Route 304 Interchange in Hernando, MS to the Intersection of U.S. 51 and State Route 385 in Millington, TN, Desoto and Marshall Counties, MS, Shelby and Fayette Counties, MS. Summary: EPA expressed concerns about aquatic resource impacts, land-use, noise, environmental justice, and connected and cumulative actions. ERP No. D-FHW-J40164-MT Rating EC2, U.S.-2 Highway Corridor Improvement Proj