Środowisko i energia · 3.12.2004

Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments

EPA expressed environmental concerns about whether the preferred alternative would resolve the existing adverse impacts from grazing to aquatic and terrestrial resources, and suggested enhancements to the analysis of impacts, the adaptive management plan and the range of alternatives. ERP No. D-COE-K36141-AZ Rating LO, Santa Cruz River Paseco de las Iglesias Feasibility Study, To Identify, Define and Solve Environmental Degradation, Flooding and Water Resource Problem, City of Tucson, Pima County, AZ. Summary: EPA does not object to the project as proposed, but requested additional information regarding coordination with Tribes and cumulative impacts. ERP No. D-NRC-G09804-NM Rating LO, National Enrichment Facility (NEF), To Construct, Operate, and Decommission a Gas Centrifuge Uranium Enrichment Facility, License Application, NUREG-1790, near Eunice, Lea County, NM. Summary: EPA has no objection to the proposed action. ERP No. D-NRS-L39060-OR Rating LO, Williamson River Delta Restoration Project, To Restore and Maintain the Ecological Functions of the Delta, Williamson River, Klamath County, OR. Summary: EPA commended NRCS for their efforts to restore ecological function and ecosys