Regulacje i polityka gospodarcza · 30/12/1999

Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments

EPA expressed environmental concerns with the proposed action due to potential significant impacts to water quality. sensitive fish habitat (Utah Bonneville cutthroat trout) and two regionally sensitive bird species. Also, we expressed concerns with the scope of alternatives lack of a detailed monitoring plan to determine if ecosystem restoration will actually be achieved, the analysis of cumulative impacts, and the limited approach to managing livestock and elk grazing on the area where aspen will be harvested. ERP No. D-BIA-L65330-WA Rating EC2, White River Amphitheater Project, Construction and Operation of a 20,000 Seat Open-Air Amphitheater on the Muckleshoot Indian Reservation, COE Section 404 Permit and NPDES Permit, Seattle-Tacoma, WA. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns due to air quality, water quality and noise impacts. EPA recommended that the final EIS provide an expanded evaluation of environmental effects, clearly identify mitigation measures (including monitoring efforts), and commit to implement appropriate mitigation measures. ERP No. D-COE-C32035-00 Rating EO2, New York and New Jersey Harbor Navigation Study, Identify, Screen and Select Navigation Chann