Regulacje i polityka gospodarcza · 6.11.1998

Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments

EPA had no objection to the selection of the lead agency's preferred alternative as described in the DEIS. ERP No. D-FAA-E51046-NC. Rating EC2, Charlotte/Douglas International Airport, Construction and Operation, New Runway 17/35 (Future 18L/36R) Associated Taxiway Improvements, Master Plan Development, Approval Airport Layout Plan (ALP) and COE Section 404 Permit, Mecklenburg County, NC. Summary: EPA's review found that the noise analysis was deficient and needs to be redone. Both general and transportation conformity criteria must be met for the project to go forward. ERP No. D-FHW-L40209-WA. Rating EC2, WA-16/Union Avenue Vicinity to WA-302 Vicinity of Tacoma Improvements, Construction, Funding, Coast Guard Permit, COE Section 10 and 404 Permits, Pierce County, WA. Summary: EPA had concerns with the likely increase of urban growth and the resulting impact. EPA requested that these issues be fully discussed in the final EIS. ERP No. D-NOA-E39044-FL. Rating LO, Guana, Tolomato, Matanizas, Site Designation, National Estuarine Research Reserve, Management Plan, City of Jacksonville, St. Johns and Flagler Counties, FL. Summary: EPA supports the proposed action. ERP No. D-NOA-E39045-M