Regulacje i polityka gospodarcza · 11.12.1998

Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments

EPA expressed environmental concerns regarding water quality, wetlands, environmental justice, land use, noise, visual and asethetic impact, and historic preservation. ERP No. D-COE-K39052-CA Rating LO, Hamilton Wetland Restoration Project, Tidal Salt Marsh Habitat, Alameda County, CA. Summary: EPA expressed a lack of objections with the DEIS and the proposed wetland restoration project. ERP No. D-IBR-K39048-CA Rating EC2, Truckee River Operating Agreement (TROA, Modify Operation and Selected Non-Federal Reservoirs, Implementation, Truckee River Basin, EL Dorado, Nevada, Placer and Sierra Counties, CA and Douglas, Lyon, Storey and Washoe Counties, NV. Summary: EPA expressed environmnetal concern that the proposed agreement does not significantly improve Lahontan cutthroat trout (LCT) habitat and recommended that the negotiating parties take this opportunity to better improve LCT habitat. EPA also requested additional information in the EIS regarding water quality, water quantity and conservation, biological resources, groundwater effects, air quality, and population growth. ERP No. D-IBR-K39050-CA Rating LO, Programmatic--CALFED Bay-Delta Program, Long-Term Comprehensive Plan to Re