Regulacje i polityka gospodarcza · 31.12.1998

Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments

EPA concerns were addressed in the Final EIS. ERP No. F-AFS-J65283-CO, North Fork Salvage Timber Analysis Area, Implementation, Medicine Bow-Routt National Forest, Routt County, CO. Summary: EPA concerns were addressed in the preferred alternative. ERP No. F-AFS-K61143-CA, Emigrant Wilderness Management Direction, Implementation, Stanislaus National Forest, Tuolume County, CA. Summary: Review of the Final EIS was not deemed necessary. No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency. ERP No. F-AFS-L61216-WA, White Pass Ski Area Expansion, Special- Use-Permit, Pigtail Basin and Hogback Basin, Wenatchee and Gifford, Pinchot National Forests, Yakima and Lewis Counties, WA. Summary: Review of the Final EIS was not deemed necessary. No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency. ERP No. F-COE-K32050-CA, Oakland Harbor Inner and Outer Deep Navigation (-50 Foot) Improvement Project, Implementation, Feasibility Study, Port of Oakland, Alameda and San Francisco Counties, CA. Summary: EPA continued to have specific comments and concerns on several issues, although the FEIS generally responded to many issues raised by EPA on the DEIS. EPA provided comments on mitigation f