Regulacje i polityka gospodarcza · 29/09/1995

Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments

EPA expressed environmental concerns over the scope of wetlands analysis and wetlands impacts in the draft EIS. Information in the draft EIS was not adequate to identify potential wetland impacts, or to assess the wetland resources. ERP No. D-AFS-J65241-MT Rating EC2, Skyline Ridge Project Area Timber Salvage and Associated Activities, Plan of Approval and Implementation, Kootenai National Forest, Three Rivers Ranger District, Lincoln County, MT. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about potential adverse water quality and channel stability effects to 5 creeks in the watershed. EPA also believes additional information is needed to fully assess and mitigate all potential environmental impacts of the actions. ERP No. D-AFS-L67034-WA Rating EO2, Crown Jewel Mine and Mill Project, Construction and Operation, Gold and Silver Mining and Milling Project, Plan of Operations Approval, Special-UsePermits and COE Section 404 Permit, Chesaw, Okanogan County, WA. Summary: EPA had environmental objections regarding water quality, hydrologic alteration, NPDES permitting, reclamation and wetland and stream mitigation. ERP No. D-FHW-K40211-HI Rating LO, Kealakehe Parkway Completion, Queen