Regulacje i polityka gospodarcza · 20/10/1995

Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments

EPA expressed environmental concerns regarding direct and cumulative impacts to water quality. Additional site specific information on bark accumulation is needed to assess impacts to the marine environment. EPA also requested additional discussion of best management practices and water quality monitoring. ERP No. D-FHW-E40760-NC Rating EC2, Sunset Beach Bridge No. 198 on Secondary Road NC-1172 Replacement, Over the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Funding, COE Section 10 and 404 Permit, Brunswick County, NC. Summary: EPA expressed environmental objections with alternatives C1 and W1 due to water quality, wetlands and noise impacts. EPA prefers alternative C4 as it would result in the least water quality and other impacts. ERP No. D-IBR-K39053-CA Rating LO, South Bay Water Recycling Program (SBWRP), Development and Construction, Funding and COE Section 404 Permit, Golden Triangle Area, City of San Jose, Santa Clara County, CA. Summary: EPA expressed a lack of environmental objections to the proposed action.