Regulacje i polityka gospodarcza · 27.10.1995

Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments

EPA expressed environmental concerns regarding the projects potential impacts to air and water quality, fish and wildlife and sensitive habitats. EPA recommended that these issues be fully assessed in the final EIS. ERP No. D-FHW-D40279-DC Rating LO, Canal Road Entrance to the Georgetown University Improvements, Reconstruction between Whitehurst Freeway and Foxhall Road, Washington, DC. Summary: EPA expressed a lack of objections to the project. Of the four build alternatives, EPA endorsed alternative 3B, a grade-separated interchange that would shift the westbound lanes of Canal Road to the north and elevate them. ERP No. D-FHW-E40761-NC Rating EC2, US 64 Bypass Transportation Improvements Project, from I-440 to US 64 west of Wendell and Eastern Wake Expressway from existing US 64 to NC-1007 (Poole Road), Funding and COE Section 404 Permit, Wake County, NC. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns regarding the environmental impacts of the loss of natural areas and the potential long-term degradation of aquatic areas related to the crossing of numerous streams. ERP No. D-FHW-K40213-NV Rating EO2, Tier 1--DEIS--Northern and Western Las Vegas Beltway Corridor Location Study, Si