Technologie i telekomunikacja · 14.06.1995

Television Broadcasting Services; Ridgecrest, CA

This document denies the petition for reconsideration filed by Valley Public Television of the Report and Order, 58 FR 58833 ( November 4, 1993), in which the Commission dismissed Valley's proposal either to substitute Channel *41 for Channel *25 or place a site restriction on Channel *25 at Ridgecrest, California, after Valley requested and was granted dismissal of the application which it intended to accommodate. The Commission determined that the reason given in support of the petition for reconsideration, to accommodate Valley's future plan to apply for Channel *39 at Bakersfield, California, was speculative and did not warrant reconsideration of its action dismissing the Ridgecrest proposal. With this action, this proceeding is terminated.